Please copy the form below for each of the papers you are refereeing, fill it in, and mail it to gaines@cpsc.ucalgary.ca (KAW96 Review).
Reviews will be forwarded to the relevant KAW96 Track Chairs, and be anonymized, collated and returned to the authors.
KAW96 Review Form Part 1 Submission #: Authors: Title: Please rate the paper for the track chairs. Excellent Poor Relevance 5 4 3 2 1 NA Excellent Poor Depth 5 4 3 2 1 NA Excellent Poor Originality 5 4 3 2 1 NA Excellent Poor Importance 5 4 3 2 1 NA Results Work-in-progress Results 5 4 3 2 1 NA YES NO Accept 5 4 3 2 1 Abstain Comments for track chairs: KAW96 Review Form Part 2 Submission #: Authors: Title: Please include both positive and negative comments for authors in each of the five sections below. Significance: How important is the work reported? Does it attack an important/difficult problem or a peripheral/simple one? Does the approach offer an advance in the state of the art? Originality: Has this or similar work been previously reported? Are the problems and approaches completely new? Is this a novel combination of familiar techniques? Does the paper discuss relevant research, or is it reinventing the wheel using new terminology? Quality: Is the paper technically sound? Does it carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of its contribution? Some dimensions for evaluation include generality, empirical behavior, theoretical analysis, and psychological validity. Clarity: Does the paper describe the methods in sufficient detail for readers to replicate the work? Does it describe inputs, outputs, and the basic algorithms employed? Is the paper well organized and well written? General comments for the authors: What changes should be made?