Your comments about PCP offering both a theory about person
functioning, as well as a theory about how people (including those that
reference themselves as psychologists) go about making theories point
up the idea that, indeed, PCP does offer a Grand Unifying Theory.
To make this claim, however, requires that one have a rather
facile comprehension of the tremendous assumptive base that underlies
PCP, as well as the assumptive base that allows one to conclude that PCP
can be taken as a GUT.
The extensive comment, particularly comments such as those that
Devi Janckowicz provided in his last posting, has certainly helped to
clarify some major portions of the assumptive base from which
afficiandos of PCP have worked.
The discussion deserves to continue. Thanks to all the contributors.
Jim Mancuso