Re: Robert A. Neimeyer's post re: cruising the WWW

jwhiteh@ibm.net
Sun, 09 Apr 95 18:48:48 -0400

Devi,

Thanks for your effort. Your description of the two poles,
_emergent_ and _implicit_, do not appear to describe an opposition or
contrast, and thus, for me at least, are of little help in
distinguishing the two posts, especially at a very superordinate
level of abstraction as opposed to the level of simple social
convention. We might say that they are the same pole and in contrast
to one of my posts. That seems fair. If thoughtful persons reach a
little, however, they may find some construct that would make a
relevant distintion between the two that some might regard as more
superordinate, and thus more regnant. I know I can. What about
anyone else?

Joe Whitehurst

>
> In message id <9504090328.AA0176@slip18-205.ga.us.ibm.net>, Joe
Whitehurst
> continues his misguided correspondence by saying

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I would rather construe my correspondence as UNguided as opposed to
misguided, but, of course, you have your own personal way of
construing events. JW
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


> <snip>
> >Would anyone care to
> >name the two poles of the most superordinate construct that would
> >distinguish the two posts I have included in this post? The first
is
> >from, Robert A. Neimeyer. The second is from Brian Gaines and
> >Mildred Shaw.
> <snip>
>
> Okay:
>
> _Emergent_
> Neimeyer polite, concerned and helpful on issues related
> to Whitehurst's communication
>
> -
>
> _Implicit_
> Gaines and Shaw polite, concerned and helpful on issues
> related to Whitehurst's communication
>
> ... er ...
>
> Got the message, Joe?
>
>
>
> Devi Jankowicz
>
>
>
>
>

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The greatest empiricists among us are only empiricists on reflection:
when left to their instincts, they dogmatize like infallible popes.

James, 1896

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%