>Anybody got any thoughts, literature etc. on the following statement:
>"...though Kelly maintains that constructs are bipolar...this probably
>cannot always be true."
Presumably any construct, X, can be made to be bipolar by taking its
opposite pole to be "not-X", or perhaps more realistically
"not-particularly-X", yet only one pole may, in practice, be salient and
the opposite pole may commonly be left vague. And exploring the
implications of the vague, rarely-explicitly-used pole may be
psychologically interesting.
==========================================================================
Tony Downing, M.A., Ph.D.
Lecturer, Dept. of Psychology,
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU,
UK.
email: A.C.Downing@Newcastle.ac.uk
Phone +44 (0)191 222 6184 Mobile: +44 (0) 468 427 481
Fax: +44 (0)191 222 5622
==========================================================================
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%