(Fwd) RE: Any thoughts on this

Chris Evans (C.Evans@sghms.ac.uk)
Wed, 3 Jun 1998 09:59:30 +0100

I think Helen meant to send this to the list, not to Malcolm & I. I guess her, or
her Email system's, construing of reply addresses is seriously fragmented.

Chris

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
From: "Jones, Helen" <JONESH@pulse.york.ac.uk>
To: pcp-request <pcp-request@mailbase.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Any thoughts on this
Date sent: Tue, 02 Jun 98 18:55:00 PDT

I wonder who wrote the statement you quote? Can you think about Kelly's
fragmentation corollory which may make sense of this? "A person may
successively employ a variety of construction systems which are
inferentially incompatible with each other" . I notice you live in
Lincolnshire...would our bi monthly PCP research group interest you?
Please contact me - telephone is easiest - on 01904 438757 (or by
e.mail...but I do have occasional problems here)

Helen Jones
----------
From: pcp-request
To: pcp
Subject: Any thoughts on this
Date: 02 June 1998 09:23

Anybody got any thoughts, literature etc. on the following statement:
"...though Kelly maintains that constructs are bipolar...this probably
cannot always be true." I'm away from my PCP filing cabinet right now but
find myself in a debate!

Thanks

Siobhan
Siobhan Alderson
Meadow View
Carr Road
North Kelsey
Lincolnshire
LN7 6LG
Phone/Fax: +44 1652 678197
alderson@pawmarks.demon.co.uk
Chris Evans, Senior Lecturer in Psychotherapy,
Locum Consultant to the
Prudence Skynner Family Therapy Clinic,
St. George's Hospital Medical School, London University
C.Evans@sghms.ac.uk http://psyctc.sghms.ac.uk/

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%