some 'technical' questions about constructs

Bob Green (bgreen@dyson.brisnet.org.au)
Sun, 29 Nov 1998 05:22:26 +1000

1. Kelly in volume 1 (The Repertory Test) speaks in several places of
constructs breaking down:

"If the constructs of nice, gentle, thoughtful, and others to which
aggressive has been the contrasting pole, begin to break down, the subject
may turn to aggressive, both as a way of seeing many other people, and as a
way of behaving himself" p.235

" By noting the linkages the perceptive clinician can also get an inkling of
the directions of future movement the client may take as a result of the
breakdown in the use of any one of a number of his constructs". p.237

"The sequential mode of presentation provides a more rigorous test of the
subject's use of role constructs. It is more likely to reveal their
breaking points". p.241

I don't recall seeing this term in v2, 'break down/breaking points' may be a
way of describing invalidation, but I don't really know. Any suggestions or
advice where this is discussed more fully would be appreciated.

2. Kelly speaks of constructs becoming impermeable/making them impermeable.
I presume the binding techniques discussed in v2 have applicability in this
regard but would be interested in other's views as to how this might occur
or be facilitated.

Regards,

Bob Green

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%