Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0?

Jay Glicksman <jay@oclc.org>

Mail folder: html-archive
Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: Initial meeting on Monday, July 25 (was Re: HTML BOF is Tuesday)"
Previous message: Peter Flynn: "Re: unordered lists in HTML2.0"

Date: Thu, 14 Jul 94 14:15:57 EDT
Message-id: <199407141813.SAA13180@hnear>
Reply-To: html-ig@oclc.org
Originator: html-ig@oclc.org
Sender: html-ig@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Jay Glicksman <jay@oclc.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-ig@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0? 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group (Private)

>For the purposes of the 2.0 spec, should we say that the
>body of a text/plain MIME body part should be a complete
>SGML document entity, or just the instance part?

For 2.0: the instance part

For 3.0: the complete SGML document entity


    Jay G.