Re: HTML 3.0 standardizationMurray Maloney <murray@sco.COM>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 09:39:47 EDT
From: Murray Maloney <murray@sco.COM>
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: HTML 3.0 standardization
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
Yes, thanks for clarifying that for us Dave.
> >I was thinking of calling it an HTML+ browser that allows us to
> >test out proposed extensions to HTML before we commit ourselves.
> >It seems important to solicit widespread input on potential new
> >features. A consensus draft spec for Spring '95 gives us several
> >months for the group discussion.
> >How would you like to position such as demonstration?
> The stance you're taking is fine with me. I just wanted to
> clarify the process and status.
> [ Dave Raggett's accent ON]
> "Greetings and thank you for coming to this demonstration. What
> I'll be demo-ing today is a testbed browser that the HTML WG
> is using to guide its discussions regarding future standards
> for HTML. It's important to the group that every language feature
> in the standard be implementable in a reasonable fashion. This
> browser helps us have 'proof of concept', as well as offering me
> the opportunity to give you all a sneak preview of what is to
> come. I'd like to thank [ the folks at CERN and whoever else ] for
> their help in getting this browser going. Now if someone will
> dim the lights, we'll focus our attention on the scr- HEY!
> What happened to the video signal from the workstation? I know
> for a fact it was working earlier, and..."
> [ Dave Raggett's accent OFF]
> Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer -- firstname.lastname@example.org 217-355-6000 ext 237
> I don't speak for Spyglass. They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
> "Never put your tongue on a glacier."