Users seem happy with the present HTML 2.0 DTD"Daniel W. Connolly" <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 14:07:32 EDT
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Users seem happy with the present HTML 2.0 DTD
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
I just got yet another "vote of confidence" for the HTML validation
service Mark Gaither and I put together. We had some trouble earlier
on with filling up filesystems and swap space because the perl scripts
didn't clean up after themselves...
But we solved those problems, and we have had hundreds of accesses of
But we have had _not one_ message complaining about "why can't I
put H5 inside a P?" or any other problems with the DTD.
So I conclude that HTML 2.0 satisfies the needs of many users.
This makes me feel _very_ conservative about changing it. :-)
p.s. names removed to protect the innocent
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 12:52:44 -0500
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Subject: HaLsoft HTML Validation Service
I'd just like to say that you've done a great job with the HTML
Validation Service. I've found it extremely useful.
------- End of Forwarded Message