Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in"
• Previous message: Eric W. Sink: "Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in"
• Reply: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in "

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 17:07:26 EDT
Message-id: <9410072106.AA01183@ulua.hal.com>
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

In message <9410072057.AA27699@hook.spyglass.com>, Eric W. Sink writes:
>
>Unless I hear otherwise, I assume that no one in the group had objections
>to Murray's 4-part contribution (regarding entities and character sets)
>be integrated into the spec.

I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but...

Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.

Other than that, everything Murray wrote is fine by me.

Dan