Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in "Daniel W. Connolly" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 17:07:26 EDT
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <email@example.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
In message <9410072057.AA27699@hook.spyglass.com>, Eric W. Sink writes:
>Unless I hear otherwise, I assume that no one in the group had objections
>to Murray's 4-part contribution (regarding entities and character sets)
>be integrated into the spec.
I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but...
Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.
Other than that, everything Murray wrote is fine by me.