Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in (Eric W. Sink)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 17:50:08 EDT
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: (Eric W. Sink)
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

>I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but...

I guess this wasn't as clear as it could have been.  Murray sent 4
specific files to the list, in HTML format, specifying content to be
added to the spec.  Those files are currently sitting on

We're still sorting out where this material is supposed to be pasted
into the actual document, but my understanding is that it should go in,
except for:

>Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
>ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.

Which I believe refers to the "Additional Entity Sets (Proposed)" section
at the botton of entities.html,


Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer -- 217-355-6000 ext 237
I don't speak for Spyglass.  They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
                                                               :-)  :-)
    "Never put your tongue on a glacier."