Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in

Peter Flynn (
07 Oct 1994 22:46:18 +0100 (BST)

Dan writes:

> I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but...
> Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
> ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.

This means &nbsp: would be disallowed. It's in ISOpub I think.
This also means < and > would have to go, as well as &

I think we should keep them in.