Re: Internet Draft

Roy T. Fielding (fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU)
Fri, 11 Nov 94 12:20:07 EST

>>No. When the 2.0 draft is "finished", there should be no Proposed
>>section -- that only existed as a means for discussing what should
>>be included in 2.0. Otherwise, we'd end up with all of HTML+ listed
>>as proposed.
> This is not at all what I perceived as the plan. It has been my
> understanding all along that the "finished" 2.0 draft would have a proposed
> section in it. If not, why did we spend all that time getting the proposed
> sections right?

My apologies -- I thought that the WG had decided to get rid of the
proposed stuff several months ago, in favor of moving quickly on a 2.1 spec.
That is why the META element was moved to the normal section, and
DFN, STRIKE,  , and ­ were removed from the DTD.

Or, did we just decide to remove them from the DTD and leave them in
the text specification? Or, is all this just a vague delusion on my part
(quite likely, as I've been up all night)?

.....Roy Fielding ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine USA