Re: Standards Track or Informational?

Dave Raggett (
Thu, 17 Nov 94 04:33:49 EST

Dan writes:

> Given that we expect HTML 2.1 to follow on soon after 2.0, do we want
> HTML 2.0 to be the standards-track RFC, or just an informational RFC?

I agree with Dan. In addition, I'm hoping we can get the 3.0 spec thru
for the April '95 IETF meeting. The first draft will be ready at the
end of this month to start the discussions rolling. It shamelessly reuses
or adapts much of the 2.0 spec.

Best wishes,

Dave Raggett