Re: ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go

Eric W. Sink (eric@spyglass.com)
Tue, 6 Dec 94 11:33:19 EST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: yuri@sq.com: "Re: ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go"
Previous message: James D Mason: "Re(2): Looking toward the IETF meeting"
Maybe in reply to: JSuttor@Library.UCLA.EDU: "ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go"
Next in thread: yuri@sq.com: "Re: ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go"

This group has already agreed to add simple, non-intrusive ICADD support
into HTML 2.0. I haven't seen anything lately which makes me think that
the ICADD decision needs to be changed.

--
Eric W. Sink, Senior Software Engineer --  eric@spyglass.com
                                           I don't speak for Spyglass.
"Can I get a direct flight back to reality, or do I have to change planes
in Denver?" - The Santa Clause

Next message: yuri@sq.com: "Re: ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go"
Previous message: James D Mason: "Re(2): Looking toward the IETF meeting"
Maybe in reply to: JSuttor@Library.UCLA.EDU: "ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go"
Next in thread: yuri@sq.com: "Re: ICADD support in HTML 2.0 - not urgent, not ready to go"