Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Fri, 28 Apr 95 21:40:21 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set"
Previous message: Gavin Nicol: "Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]"
Next in thread: Dave Raggett: "Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]"

Proposals that are going to be separate standards track documents
should be made internet drafts; you can have a pointer in some http:
directory elsewhere, but submit it to the Internet Drafts editor too.

I've done this for 'file upload', and hope that we'll see such for
"character sets" considered harmful, tables, navigational idioms,
structural idioms, forms, etc.

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set"
Previous message: Gavin Nicol: "Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]"
Next in thread: Dave Raggett: "Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?]"