Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set

Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Sat, 6 May 95 18:16:02 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as"
Previous message: Ned Freed: "Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set"
Next in thread: Terry Allen: "Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set"

Terry Allen writes:
> >I actually make ISO10646 a binding constraint without putting it
> in the public text (the SGML declaration). See what you think:
>
>
> That's bogus. We need the SGML declaration that goes with your language.

This is argument by assertion.

Why do we "need the ..."

Dan

Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as"
Previous message: Ned Freed: "Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set"
Next in thread: Terry Allen: "Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set"