This is the argument I've been waiting to hear. (except that the SGML
standard is not vague on conformance.) It sounds good to me, but I
thought we agreed that it was a good thing if all browsers handled
this type of error the same way. The June 2 verbage is motivated by
the fact that several widely deployed browsers behave that way.
> We had this discussion before, and there was no concensus
>on how to handle out-of-range numeric character references, hence, we
>should not pretend there is concensus now.
Hmm... I guess I saw it differently. I'm sorry to drag this out, but
Eric: could you give the chair's position on this, so we can move on?
Dan