Re: Numeric char references

Daniel W. Connolly (
Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:54:11 EDT

In message <>, Jon_Bo writes:
>I proposed last week that we include a complete list, in numeric
>order, of the entire Latin-1 character set from 160 through 255
>standardized by ISO 8859-1. It has been decided (for good reasons
>that I don't completely agree with but do understand) not to include
>that list,

Er... sorry. I must have been sleeping. This is a great list.
I just pasted it in place of the list that was in the "proposed elements"