Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0?

Dave Kristol (
Wed, 14 Jun 95 10:15:29 EDT (Eric W. Sink) said:
> If the W3C folk think we need more written material on lexical issues with
> HTML, then let them write it up. Have them join the WG and we can work with
> them on it as another followup document to the main RFC.

How about (Dan) producing a (draft) informational RFC that describes
the tokenization of SGML/HTML? A separate document would provide the
desired documentation but would not impede the standardization of HTML
2.0. Adding more wording to a document that required a lot of time to
reach rough consensus would further delay the process and introduce new

Dave Kristol