> Perhaps the current spec should be more specific about the treatment of
> such a non-conformant document. For example, it could say:
>
> 1. An unknown element encountered within HEAD shall be interpreted as an
> implicit termination of HEAD and shall be interpreted according
> to the content model:
That heuristic will break on future extensions like <STYLE>,
which can appear in the <HEAD> and has content.
Plus, I don't think the spec should say any more about
how to deal with illegal documents than it already does.
--Joe English
joe@art.com