Joe English (
Tue, 4 Jul 95 16:37:31 EDT

Glenn Adams <> wrote:

> Perhaps the current spec should be more specific about the treatment of
> such a non-conformant document. For example, it could say:
> 1. An unknown element encountered within HEAD shall be interpreted as an
> implicit termination of HEAD and shall be interpreted according
> to the content model:

That heuristic will break on future extensions like <STYLE>,
which can appear in the <HEAD> and has content.

Plus, I don't think the spec should say any more about
how to deal with illegal documents than it already does.

--Joe English