Re: Jung/PCP & preemption

Jack Gerber (
Sun, 26 Feb 1995 16:33:29 -0500 (EST)

On Sat, 25 Feb 1995 wrote:

> If te is indeed an incompatibility clearly defined between Jung's theory and
> Kelly's theory, then I think Kelly would say, "Fantastic! You're half done.
> Now, what opposing predictions lead from this incompatibility, if indeed what
> you say is useful?"
> Then, from there, exist the potential alternatives: Retain Jung's theory and
> discard Kelly's. Retain Kelly's theory and discard Jung's. Set to work
> forging a new construction which supercedes both. And for Kelly, as I knew
> him, THAT was pure joy and excitement.
Very well said. Point well taken.

Jack Gerber