Re: transparency and paradigms

Lois Shawver (
Wed, 15 May 1996 19:42:00 -0700 (PDT)

On Wed, 15 May 1996 wrote:

> Interesting, but this seems to define modernity only by its negatives.
> I don't think modernity should be defined in terms of adopting a "fight"
> mode, although this might be a part of modernity (and it may even have
> value..

The "fighting" part of modernity comes about because people will fight
for their metanarratives, sometimes to the death.

..Lois Shawver