[Fwd: Ruling Class (CFR) Psy-Ops]

Jim Legg (income@ihug.co.nz)
Sun, 07 Sep 1997 01:47:28 +1200

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm forwarding this lengthy post because of the reference to Kelly's
work. "George A. Kelly (Politics Professor,

I don't know if others on this list will get the obvious dialectic
between personal and public construct theories, but Kelly is seen here
playing both sides against the middle.

Jim Legg
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: owner-prj@mail.msen.com
Received: from mail.msen.com (majordom@conch.msen.com []) by icarus.ihug.co.nz (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA25405 for <income@ihug.co.nz>; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 00:23:49 +1200 (NZST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mail.msen.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) id IAA25263 for prj-outgoing; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 08:12:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from karenpoo (dt01-d02.detroit.msen.com []) by mail.msen.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA24653; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 08:07:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199709061207.IAA24653@mail.msen.com>
Reply-To: "Lloyd Miller" <lloyd@a-albionic.com>
From: "Lloyd Miller, Research Director" <lloyd@a-albionic.com>
To: "A-albionic \"Weekly\" Update" <prj_weekly@mail.msen.com>,
"New Paradigms Discussion Group" <prj@mail.msen.com>,
"Agendas" <agendas@maelstrom.stjohns.edu>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1008.3
X-MimeOle: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.1008.3
Subject: Ruling Class (CFR) Psy-Ops
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 08:05:10 -0400
Sender: owner-prj@mail.msen.com
Precedence: bulk

A-albionic Research Weekly Up-date of 9-6-97

In This Issue

1. CFR member Nitze's "Not-Sees" - Exercises In Controlled Insanity

Outstanding article explains how the "ruling class/conspiracy",
operating through its kept intellectuals at the CFR and elesewhere, subtly
achieves its propaganda objectives world wide.

2. Recommended Reading Catalog Up-Dates

See: http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/newresp.html


1. CFR member Nitze's "Not-Sees" - Exercises In Controlled Insanity

Date: Friday, September 05, 1997 1:31 PM
Subject: CFR member Nitze's "Not-Sees" - Exercises In Controlled Insanity


In "A DIFFERENT FORM OF CAPITALISM" for Johns Hopkins Magazine, Dale Keiger

"In working on his latest book, CHALLENGE TO AMERICA, Pulitzer
Prize winner Hedrick Smith has been observing the enormous rise in power of
the East Asian economy. "Not just Japan," he says, "but the 'mini-dragons'
[Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong], and beyond them Malaysia,
Indonesia, and, the biggest of all, China..
"Their economies operate differently from ours," notes Smith, an
editor-in-residence at Hopkins's Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies. "They have a different form of capitalism. They operate from
Confucian standards." Smith contrasts the Confucian ideal with standard
American capitalism. The traditional American belief has been that each
person working for individual gain will result in the greatest common good.
A good American is supposed to work hard for his or her own aggrandizement;
a good American corporation for the immediate profit of the shareholders..
Confucianism, he says, emphasizes hard work "as an obligation to
society, not just to personally getting ahead." In the Confucian tradition,
a worker feels strong social pressure to work hard as a form of respect to
ancestors, the company, and the broader society. Professional obligations
are mutual, Smith points out; for example, companies in Confucian societies
go to great lengths to retain their workers. --DK"

Paul Henry Nitze, and Hedrick Smith are Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
members. Not many people heard of the CFR or know how they operate. The
group has purposely maintained a low profile while controlling public
opinion throughout the world for over 100 years. Branches in Western
European and Commonwealth nations are called Institutes of International
Affairs (Britain (R(oyal)IIA, Canadian(CIIA), New Zealand(NZIIA),
Australian(AIIA), South African(SAIIA),. India(IIIA), and
Netherlands(NIIA)). Branches in Eastern European and East Asian Nations
are called Institutes of Pacific Relations (Japanese (JIPR), Chinese
(CIPR), and Russian (RIPR)).

Nitze has been a fixture in Washington since 1946 and has served in the
State Department and as Secretary of the Navy. In 1989 Nitze founded the
Paul H. Nitze School for Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns
Hopkins University. In 1993 Nitze published a book titled TENSION BETWEEN

When a CFR member tries to make a difference it is a difference designed to
create tension between two or more target groups. Nitze's targets have been
the US, Russia, and Asia. When nuclear weapons made their ominous debut at
the end of World War II, Nitze was there. As Vice-Chairman of the US
Strategic Bombing Survey, Nitze witnessed first-hand the effects of the
A-bomb at the sites of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Hadley Cantril and Lloyd Free were Princeton University Social
Psychologists; researchers; and members of the intelligence community. CFR
member Nelson Rockefeller funded them to develop psycho-political policy
strategies and techniques. In "How Nations See Each Other." (1953) Cantril
writes about a tool, developed prior to 1939, to investigate people's
perception of their nationality and other nationalities. The tool became
known as the Buchanan-Cantril "Adjective Check List." [1]

The "Adjective Check List", contained twelve adjectives: Hard-working;
Intelligent; Practical; Generous; Brave; Progressive; Self-Controlled;
Peace-Loving; Conceited; Cruel; Domineering; Backward. It was based on the
observation people tend to ascribe to their group a set of characteristics
different from the character traits ascribed to other groups. The resulting
self-image is predominantly flattering, while their picture of "others" is
strongly influenced by how much they perceive those others to be like
themselves. The relative "similarity" or dissimilarity" between group
stereotypes is a useful indicator of the degree of like or dislike between
groups or nations. [2]

The adjective check-list is used to help script and test the effectiveness
of psycho-political operations focused at entire nations. Groups are tested
to determine the degree of like/dislike between them. The Information is
used to script the PSYOP. The PSYOP is carried out without the groups
knowledge. The groups are tested again. The increase or decrease of
like/dislike indicates the PSYOP's effectiveness.

Adolph Hitler, and his propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels warped History
by ignoring it completely, and stressing favorable and unfavorable truths
to cause tension and hate between different groups of people. Goebbels'
work fascinated CFR member Edward R. Murrow. The Rockefeller Foundation
funded Murrow to perform a systematic analysis of Nazi radio propaganda
techniques and the political use of radio.

Murrow, with help from Cantril and Free, began the project at Princeton in
1940. The Princeton Listening Center was set up in an old house on
Alexander Street, belonging to Princeton's Institute of Advanced Study
(IASP). IASP was a reasonable copy of the Royal Institute of International
Affairs chief Oxford headquarters, All Souls College. CFR member Abraham
Flexner of Rockefeller's General Education Board and foundation
administrator, organized it from plans drawn by Tom Jones, one of the Royal
Institute of International Affairs most active intriguers and foundations
administrators. [3]

This project resulted in a world wide monitoring and broadcasting
Government agency called the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS).
Monitoring stations sprang up near Washington DC, Portland, San Francisco,
Texas, Puerto Rico, and a London office in liaison with the British
Broadcasting Corporation. FBIS would 1. broadcast our propaganda; 2.
monitor enemy propaganda; 3. provide special reports analyzing propaganda,
ours and the enemies; and 4. collect and disseminate intelligence to
predict Axis moves, both military and political. FBIS collected around
500,000 words a day in 15 languages from 25 transmitters. Daily reports and
analyses of the information were furnished to over 500 government
officials. FBIS became a regular part of the Government's intelligence

FBIS was a Psychological Warfare machine. FBIS became the United States
Information Agency (USIA). The USIA was established to achieve US foreign
policy by influencing public attitude at home and abroad using
psycho-political policy strategies. The USIA Office of Research and
reference service prepares data on psychological factors and propaganda
problems considered by the Policy Planning Board in formulating
psycho-political information policies for the National Security Council.
Murrow would subsequently be named head of the USIA. Murrow became the
Propaganda minister for the US -- America's Joseph Goebbels. [4]

In his book The Human Dimension (Rutgers Univ. Press 1967), Cantril
recommends learning about people's wants, desires and beliefs. He
recommends using this information to manipulate people's reality worlds so
they perceive their own best interests are being served, while in fact,
some other plan and policy are carried out. The NSC, the CIA. the USIA,
and the Department of State would decide the policy. Cantril writes about a
special group, called the Psychological Strategy Board, tasked with
coordinating this effort.

Cantril doesn't tell the reader the CFR controls the NSC, the CIA, the USIA
and the State Department. Or, that the Psychological Strategy board was
designed and directed by CFR member Gordan Gray and his consultant CFR
member Henry Kissinger. Or, that the Psychological Strategy board, would
later became the Operations Coordinating Board, and then the "Special
Group." This small group was helped by a "Secret Team" of about 3000
Council of Foreign Relations members within the administration and spread
throughout private industry. Cantril doesn't tell the reader the CFR is a
branch of an International Group of co-conspirators.

Cantril's misinformation is an example of a tactic of deception called a
"Limited Hangout." "Limited Hangouts" are used to shape public opinion to
support the aims of well planned psychological operations. Stories are
carefully crafted to contain some of the truth while withholding key
information. "Tactics of Deception" are nothing more than a sophisticated
form of lying.

The Psychological Strategy Board became the renamed super-powered
Operations Coordinating Board (OCB). The OCB had a vague ambiguous name
that didn't provoke curiosity. It had more members than the Psychological
Strategy board. It had the same mission, to use psychological strategy,
propaganda, and mass media, to manipulate huge groups of individuals. It
had a psychological warfare machine -- the United States Information Agency
at its disposal. The USIA would be responsible for foreign policy
propaganda for the NSC.

The National Security Council is responsible for recommending national
security policy. The President for having the policy approved. The
Operations Coordinating Board for coordinating interdepartmental aspects of
operational policy plans to insure their timely and coordinated execution.

The National Security Council's recommended national security policy is the
de facto foreign policy of the United States.The Department of State's
Policy Planning Board scripted the policy for the NSC. The USIA Office of
Research and Reference service prepared data on psychological factors and
propaganda problems. The Policy Planning Board used the data in formulating
psycho-political information policies for the NSC. In 1955 the Director of
the USIA became a voting member of the Operations Coordinating board; USIA
representatives were invited to attend meetings of the NSC Planning Board;
and the USIA Director was invited to Cabinet meetings. [5]

In 1947 Council on Foreign Relations members George Kennan, Walter
Lippmann, Paul Nitze, Dean Achenson, and Walter Krock took part in a
psycho-political operation forcing the Marshall Plan on the American
public. The PSYOP included an "anonymous" letter credited to Kennan which
appeared in the Council on Foreign Relations magazine FOREIGN AFFAIRS. The
letter opened the door for the CFR controlled Truman administration to take
a hard line against the threat of Soviet expansion.

The Council on Foreign Relations controls public opinion by controlling
both sides of an argument. The winning argument costs the American taxpayer
billions of dollars. The billions are funneled into CFR controlled
medicine, munition, food, and media industries at home and abroad. The
billions are used to create and deliver massive psycho-political operations
that manipulate people's reality worlds so they perceive their own best
interests are being served, while in fact, some other plan and policy are
carried out. The billions are used to keep the American's and people in
other nations throughout the world in a state of controlled insanity and
eternal war.

CFR members are placed on each side of the debate. The outcome is decided
in advance. The side meant to lose withholds key information that would
cause public opinion to go against Council plans. In the Marshall Plan
PSYOP Kennan was for the plan and Lippmann against it. Kennan's side won.
Years latter in his memoirs Kennan would say that upon reflection Lippmann
was right.

In 1950 another PSYOP resulted in NSC-68, a key cold war document. The
National Security Council didn't write it -- the Department of State Policy
Planning Staff did. The cast of characters included CFR members George
Kennan, Paul Nitze, and Dean Achenson. CFR member Kennan took the losing
position, CFR members Achenson and Nitze the winning position. CFR
engineered policies such as NSC-68 and the Marshall Plan have more to do
with shaping Western and East Asian economies then Confucian or
Judeo/Christian ethics ever did.

In September 1949 the Soviets exploded an atom bomb. Four months latter
President Truman ordered the Atomic Energy Commission to begin H-bomb
development. He also directed the NSC to reappraise American policies. The
reappraisal was National Security Council Document 68 (NSC-68). According
to NSC-68, "Events since the end of World War II have created a new power
relationship in the world which must be viewed not as a temporary
distortion but as a long-range fundamental realignment among nations...The
US and USSR are the terminal poles of this new international axis."[6]

NSC-68 was a document of dire expectations. It said the Soviet Union, was
"animated by a new fanatical faith, antithetical to our own, and seeks to
impose its absolute authority over the rest of the world." NSC-68 set up
three premises -- (1) the Soviets wanted to conquer the world (2) there was
a growing Soviet military superiority, and (3) it was impossible to
negotiate with Soviet Leadership. NSC-68 warned, "Based on these premises
an indefinite period of tension and danger is foreseen for the United
States and for the West -- a period that should be defined less as a
short-term crisis than as a permanent and fundamental alteration in the in
the shape of international relations."[7]

Achenson, the hard-liner in the PSYOP, laid the foundations for increased
mobilization. Kennan took the other side arguing the end result would be
exclusively a plea for military buildup, resulting in the virtual
elimination of diplomacy. Achenson prevailed. CFR member Kennan asked to be
relieved as chairman of the Policy Planning Staff early in 1950. CFR member
Paul Nitze replaced him. Kennan was sent on a mission to South America --
some punishment! [8]

Under Nitze's direction, the State Department's drafts of NSC-68 became
increasingly warlike. Achenson took to the road "preaching the premise of
NSC-68." Since NSC-68 was conducted under the guise of the National
Security Council -- Achenson didn't have to reveal its exact content. This
made for lots less nosy and distracting questions from elected
representatives of the people. [9]

NSC-68 set up and struck down three straw men: (1) a retreat to
isolationism, (2) another preventive war, (3) a continuation of the status
quo of reduced defense budgets and limited capabilities. NSC-68 called for
America to "strike out on a bold and massive program of rebuilding the
West's defensive potential to surpass that of the Soviet world, and of
meeting each fresh challenge promptly and unequivocally." NSC-68 was a
psycho-political operation to change the two hundred year old way Americans
thought about war and taxes -- NSC-68 concluded:

"This means virtual abandonment by the United States of trying to
distinguish between national and global security. It also means the end of
subordinating security needs to the traditional budgeting restrictions; of
asking 'How much security can we afford?' In other words, security must
henceforth become the dominant element in the national budget, and other
elements must be accommodated to it.
The wealth potential of the country is such that as much as 20 per
cent of the gross national product can be devoted to security without
causing national bankruptcy. This new concept of the security needs of the
nation calls for annual appropriations of the order of $50 billion, or not
much below their former wartime levels." [10]

NSC-68 was given to Truman on April 7, 1950. NSC-68 was a practical
extension of the Truman doctrine. It had the US assume the role of world
policeman and use 20 per cent of its gross national product ($50 billion in
1953) for arms. NSC-68 provided the justification -- the WORLD WIDE
COMMUNIST THREAT! CFR member Under Secretary of State James Webb sent a
memo to Truman warning he would face "the problem of how to get up enough
public steam to support ... starting to build up our strength, and at the
same time ... not get up so much as to look provocative." [11]

An Ad Hoc Committee met on May 2nd. William Schaub of the Budget Bureau
started asking some basic questions: Wouldn't the buildup force the
Russians into military action? What were the commitments, and at what point
would the US fight to defend them? What would everything cost? Did it make
sense to reduce complex world problems to a clash between the "free world"
and a "slave society?" Were there no valid reasons why people under
despotic governments turned to communism? Why did the research group
minimize, "economic and social change as a factor in the underlying
conflict." Schaub's questions never saw the light of day. On the 25th of
June 1950 tanks and troops of the Soviet Puppet State of North Korea
crossed the border into the American protectorate of South Korea. The
United Nations authorized the United States to repel the invasion. It was
not hard to get the national support needed for NSC-68 to become

NSC-68 realized a major Council on Foreign Relations aim -- building the
largest military establishment in Peace Time History. Within a year of
drafting NSC-68, the security-related budget leaped to $22 billion, armed
forces manpower was up to a million -- CFR medicine, munition, food, and
media businesses were humming again. The following year the NSC-68 budget
rose to $44 billion. In fiscal 1953 it jumped to $50 billion.Today (1997)
we are still running $300 billion dollar defense budgets despite our enemy
giving up because it went bankrupt. America would never turn back from the
road of huge military spending. Spending that included the purchase of
radioactive fallout on American citizens in the 50's, and buying
thermonuclear waste from the Russians as we approach the year 2000.
Spending resulting in a national debt of $5 Trillion Dollars that continues
to grow, and interest payments of over $270 billion a year. Is the Council
on Foreign Relations trying to make the United States economically
vulnerable to influence from outside sources? Isn't that treason?[13]

In 1953 Dean Achenson gave a seminar at Princeton, home of the Council on
Foreign Relations Institute for Advanced Study (IASP). Achenson talked
about NSC-68. Achenson was questioned as to how resistance to the policy
was overcome. Achenson explained "Korea came along and saved us." What
Achenson didn't explain was how Korea came along, and who made it happen --
the Council on Foreign Relations, the Institutes of International Affairs,
and the Institutes of Pacific Relations.

In CHALLENGE TO AMERICA, Hedrick Smith targets Americans, East Asians, and
people of faith. Attacking your targets faith is an effective psychological
warfare technique for demoralizing an enemy. Legalizing and encouraging
immoral actions is one way of attacking a target groups faith. The CFR
controls the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial systems. Encouraging
witnesses to lie under oath encourages people to take the Lords name in
vain; condones bearing false witness against ones neighbors; and allows the
guilty to go free while encouraging people to steal and murder. Legalizing
divorce legalizes and encourages adultery and promiscuity. Legalizing
abortion legalizes and encourages murder. Smith attacks his targets faith
by creating tension between followers of Western and Eastern religions.
Smith creates the false impression that Western and Eastern religions are
based upon different ethical theisms. This is misinformation. The ethical
and moral foundations of Western and Eastern religions are remarkably
similar. What better way to attack a people's faith then to confuse them
about the ethics and morals that guide that faith?

Hedrick Smith is a Pulitzer Prize-winning correspondent who worked for The
New York Times for 26 years. He worked in Washington, Moscow, Cairo, Saigon
and Paris. Smith authored several national best selling books, including

Smith produced more than 20 documentaries. "INSIDE GORBACHEV'S USSR,"
provided viewers with candid, close-up portraits of the Soviet people, as
they grappled with Mikhail Gorbachev's efforts to transform the Soviet
political and economic system. "RETHINKING AMERICA" expanded on Smith's PBS
documentary series, "CHALLENGE TO AMERICA" which showed how innovators in
America, Japan and Germany are making schools, businesses, jobs and people
work more effectively to meet the challenge of the new global economy.

Smith's documentaries are globalony. Smith's propaganda shifts the focus
away from the America's Council on Foreign Relations, Western
European/Commonwealth Institutes of International Affairs, and Eastern
European/East Asian Institutes of Pacific Relations -- the real reason for
the enormous rise in power of the East Asian economy. Smith's propaganda
implies the East Asian economic system is somehow better than the American
system. Meanwhile in East Asia psycho-political operations with an opposite
spin are taking place. The East Asian people are being told the American
system is superior to the East Asian system. By creating tension,
confusion, and hate between Americans and East Asians the CFR fraternity of
international co-conspirators can control trade and industry in both
countries without competition. Pretty slick!

Smith's arguments confuse and misled. We are told the East Asian economic
system,including Communist China, is a form of capitalism. We are told
East Asian Capitalism is based upon Confucian ethics, which emphasize "an
obligation to society, not just to personally getting ahead." We are told
the American economic system emphasizes workers who work for their own
aggrandizement and corporations that work for the profit of the
shareholders. Smith is creating the perception that the American system is
based upon selfishness and the East Asian system upon self-sacrifice.

If you feel anger toward East Asians Smith's propaganda effectively
manipulated you. The truth is neither economic system is driven by the
ethical and moral codes of the people of East Asia or America. The economic
systems in East Asia and America are driven by a group of greedy,
avaricious cheats and liars like Hedrick Smith, that belong to the CFR and
its fraternal organizations throughout the world.

The Chinese Institute of Pacific Relations runs Chinese government and
industry. In April of 1989 the Chinese Government demonstrated the great
lengths it would go to to retain its workers. Students camped out in
Beijing's Tiananamon Square protesting economic and political corruption in
Chinese Government. Over 100,000 students and workers marched. Twenty other
cities in China saw similar protests. Martial law was imposed. Army troops
crushed protests in Tiananamon Square. Death toll estimates were between
500-7000. Ten thousand people were injured. Ten Thousand dissidents were
arrested. Thirty-one dissidents were tried and executed.

CFR member Congressman Richard Gephardt (D-MO), recently informed the TV
audience America will soon have to relinquish control to an "International
Regime." Are we approaching the day when students and workers marching in
the United States will be crushed by UN Peacekeeping Forces under the
control of this International Regime? Who will control the Regime? The
Council on Foreign Relations?

Are documentaries and books such as Smith's used to brainwash the American
public while informing knowledgeable intelligence operatives about the
climate of public opinion the Council on Foreign Relations wishes to
achieve? Are historians and economists who try and present an accurate
picture blacklisted by members of the CFR who pick and choose what to
present the Public through Newspapers, Radio, and TV? Are they in
competition with trained operatives who lead double lives and work for the
USIA, State Department, and various intelligence organizations?

Suppressing an opponents views is as important a propaganda technique as
getting your side of the story out. Ignoring history is a "tactic of
deception" used to warp historical truth. Conspicuously absent from
Pulitzer Prize winner Hedrick Smith's books and documentaries is the CFR
role in world economic affairs. CHALLENGE TO AMERICA warps historical truth
by failing to include the Council on Foreign Relations role in engineering
the East Asian Rise to power. This is no accident. If the public is
ignorant of the group responsible for instigating tension, it can't prevent
that group from archiving its aims.

Is failure to report accurately a criteria for winning a Pulitzer? Is being
a CFR member or insider a criteria for winning a Pulitzer?

In his book CLOAK & GOWN, CFR member Robin Winks explores the underlying
bonds between the university and intelligence community. Winks, warps
historical fact in the same manner as Smith. What Winks fails to explore is
the underlying bonds between the Council on Foreign Relations and the
Intelligence Community.

Is the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, a training ground
for CFR controlled State Department and Intelligence Organization
operatives specializing in economic warfare? Is Yale University a Spy
School? Do University Professors and students connected with intelligence
organizations use their University status as a cover for the parts they
play in well planned CFR State Department run psycho-political operations?
Are unwitting Teachers and Students used as extras and set up as decoys and
bait in well planned psycho-dramas? Do Smith and members of his documentary
crew also work for the CIA, NSC, USIA, State Department, or other
intelligence agencies?

In America the Council on Foreign Relations controls the State Department,
the Intelligence Agencies, the Federal Reserve, the Executive office, and
both houses of Congress. In East Asian countries, the Governments and
Economic systems are run by Institutes of Pacific Relations -- CFR
fraternal organizations. It is the CFR members and their fraternity
brothers in other nations who work for their own aggrandizement while at
the same time making sure corporations at home and abroad maximize their
profits at the expense of their fellow countrymen.

In the late 1960's and early 1970's Council leaders Zbigniew Brzezinski,
and David Rockefeller created the Trilateral Commission (TC), which
included 60 members from Japan and 60 from Western Europe and 205
Americans. Almost all the American members belong to the Council on Foreign
Relations. The Trilateral Commission's publicized goal was to develop
closer economic and political cooperation among the industrialized
democracies in dealing with economic competition among themselves and with
challenges from underdeveloped countries. Its real goal was exactly the
opposite -- to control the global economy through well planned
psycho-political operations creating tension between peoples of different
nations and faiths resulting in an eternal state of conflict and war.

The CFR and the Trilateral Commission dominate key positions in America's
government, military, industries, media outlets and educational foundations
and institutions. The CFR's membership is limited to 3,000, and the
Trilateral Commission to 325 members. The Council on Foreign Relations
propaganda machine manipulates American Citizens to accept the particular
climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world. CFR members
working in an ad hoc committee called the "Special Group" and through a
vast intragovernmental undercover infrastructure called the "Secret Team"
formulate this opinion in the US. The CFR, has methodically taken over the
Department of State, The Federal Reserve, and the CIA.

CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski is also employed by Hopkins's Nitze School
of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). CFR members Brzezinski (Public
Law and Government Professor, Columbia ); Frederick C. Barghoorn (Political
Science Professor, Yale ); and George A. Kelly (Politics Professor,
The book contains a series of case studies sponsored by the US Department
of the Army.

Other CFR members and insiders employed by SAIS are Christian Herter, and
Council on Foreign Relations Fellows Andrew J. Bacevich and Wilford L.

Missing from the numerous articles, books, and documentaries of SAIS
faculty members Nitze, Smith, Brzezinski , Herter, Bacevich, and Kohl is a
connection between the Council on Foreign Relations and their influence in
world affairs. Such oversight can hardly be coincidental. CFR member
Nitze's "Not-Sees" are using American Tax payer dollars to create and
deliver massive psycho-political operations that manipulate the American
publics reality worlds so they perceive their own best interests are being
served, while in fact, some other plan and policy is carried out to profit
CFR members and their coconspirators in other nations. CFR member Nitze's
"Not-Sees" are using American Tax-payer dollars to keep the American's in a
state of controlled insanity and eternal war. Congressman, that is treason.

Congressman, Council on Foreign Relations members are a group of subtle
fascists intent on creating one world order under their control. It is time
to investigate the members of the Council on Foreign Relations, The
Institutes of International Affairs, and the Institutes of Pacific


[1] Pollock, Daniel C Project Director & Editors De Mclaurin,Ronald,
Rosenthal, Carl F., Skillings, Sarah A., The Art and Science of
Psychological Operations: Case Studies of Military Application Volume One,
Pamphlet No. 725-7-2, DA Pam 525-7-2, Headquarters Department of the Army
Washington, DC, 1 April 1976 Vol 2 pg 806 - The Hungarian Self-Image And
The Hungarian Image of Americans and Russians by Radio Free Europe,
Audience and Public Opinion Research Department, February 1970 Excerpts
from "The Hungarian Self-Image and the Hungarian Image of Americans,
Russian, Germans, Rumanians, and Chinese"; Buchanan, W. Cantril, H. "How
Nations See Each Other," University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1953; Cantril
H. and Strunk M.: "Public Opinion 1935-1946" Princeton University Press

[2] IBID

[3] Hadley Cantril, The Human Dimension: Experiences in Policy Research,
Rutgers The State University, 1967 pg 32-34, 30-31; he War and Peace
Studies of The Council On Foreign Relations 1939-1945, The Harold Pratt
House 58th E. 68th Street, NY, 1946, pg. 24; Quigley, Carroll, Tragedy and
Hope, Macmillan, New York 1966, p. 953

[4 ]Hadley Cantril, The Human Dimension: Experiences in Policy Research,
Rutgers The State University, 1967 pg 32-34, 30, 33-34

[5]Henderson, John W.,The United States Information Agency, 1966, pg. 52-53
Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, New York, Washington, London, Book 14 in
the Praeger Library of US Government Departments and Agencies series,
consulting editors Ernest S. Griffith, former Dean and Professor Emeritus,
School Of International Service, American University. Hugh Langdon Elsbree,
former Chairmen, Department of Political Science, Dartmouth College. Both
editors are formed directors, Legislative Reference Service, Library of

[6] Bernard A. Weisberger, Cold War Cold Peace The United States and Russia
Since 1945, American Heritage 1984, Forbes Building, 60 Fifth Avenue, NY,
NY 10011, Houghton Mifflin Company 1987 pg. 98; George J.A. O'Toole,
Honorable Treachery, A History of US Intelligence, Espionage, and Covert
Action from the American Revolution to the CIA, A Morgan Entrekin Book The
Atlantic Monthly Press, New York (1991) pgs 301; Ronald Steel, Walter
Lippmann and the American Century, Boston: Little Brown, 1980 p 448-449

[7]Bernard A. Weisberger, Cold War Cold Peace The United States and Russia
Since 1945, American Heritage 1984, Forbes Building, 60 Fifth Avenue, NY,
NY 10011, Houghton Mifflin Company 1987 pg. 99

[8] IBID 99

[9] IBID 99

[10] IBID 101

[11] IBID 103

[12] IBID 103

[13] IBID 103

Visit the Roundtable Web Page:

2. Recommended Reading Up-dates

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
To Discuss Ideas:
mailto:lloyd@a-albionic.com http://msen.com/~lloyd/
For Ordering Info & Free Catalog:
mailto:james@a-albionic.com http://a-albionic.com/

**FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <http://a-albionic.com/search.html> **
Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.com>