> Is preferrable to
> > <INCLUDE ID=foobar NAME="foobar" HREF="http://foo.com/bar.html.inc"
> > REL="subdoc" REV="glossary"
> > TITLE="The definition of foobar is...">
> because the parser can validate the former, but not the latter.
Good argument!
> >As they are SGML NAMES, aren't they case insensitve?
>
> Not necessarily! The RFC sets
> NAMECASE GENERAL YES
> ENTITY NO
> (page 477 in Golfarb), but the RFC does not equal SGML!
I would prefer case insensitve names to avoid errors. How should
we change this?
-- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> tel: +44 117 922 8046 fax: +44 117 922 8924
Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Filton Road, Bristol BS12 6QZ, United Kingdom