Re: Enhancements for HTML 2.1

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Sat, 18 Mar 1995 22:08:49 PST

We'll know consensus when we see it. Perhaps a more detailed
elaboration of the state of the issues would help.

On the following, are there multiple proposals? A single proposal but
objections? Or no proposals?

| Tables - must have, work still to do
| Styles - no consensus yet
| Footnotes - OK
| HyTime links - no consensus reached
| Client-side scripting - no proposal yet
| Full SGML in the client - no proposal yet
| Unicode support - no consensus reached
| FIG extension - OK
| client side image map - no consensus reached