> > why should we invent Yet Another Table Format when we could use a
> > subset of an existing one that is well established?
>
> This is the heart of the issue.
>
> Tables are complex, and their markup will necessarily be so as well.
> Unless the existing SGML model is demonstrably deficient, it would be
> folly to generate another.
>
Exactly, tables are complex, you can't get away from it. The "casual"
HTML user will not use tables in their HTML documents. Even a
simplified table model will result in a learning curve to the
HTML Author.
I vote for a UNIFIED table model. If it takes getting the HTML,
SGML & CALS communities in a room to fight it out, we need to
come to a consensus. It is to the benefit of all three communities.
Betty
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Betty Harvey <harvey@oasys.dt.navy. | David Taylor Model Basin
Advanced Information Systems Branch | Carderock Division
Code 183 | Naval Surface Warfare
Bethesda, Md. 20084-5000 | Center
| DTMB,CD,NSWC URL:
http://navysgml.dt.navy.mil | harvey@eccnet.planetcom.com
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/