>
> HTML 1.0 specified that image formats should be one of .xbm or .gif.
> But I can't find anything in the 3.0 standard that says whether or not
> JPEG is a supported format. Was this intentional? Or was it just to get
> around the whole .gif vs. .png issue? Maybe it's in some other section
> than where I expected to find it. Help me out.
This has nothing to do with HTML. but browsers.
All browsers can display .xbm and .gif (prefered). New ones can display
JPEG.
-eric
+----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| Eric A Perlman | http://www.yikes.com/ | SPLAT! |
| ericp@well.com | http://crew.bhs.berkeley.k12.ca.us/Crew/ | /dev/null |
+----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+