Re: Levels

"Daniel W. Connolly" <>
Message-id: <>
Subject: Re: Levels 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Jun 1994 16:21:32 EDT."
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 15:29:28 -0500
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <>
Content-Length: 623
In message <199406102019.NAA03324@rock>, Terry Allen writes:
>Dan suggests using the same DTD but referring to it by
>3 different public identifiers.  But why is this better
>than 3 DTDs, perhaps produced automatically as subsets
>of a master DTD, if what is desired is to cut down on
>DTD maintenance?

I'm not sure if it'll end up as three completely independent
texts, or one big one with lots of marked sections and
two little things that look like:

	#define level_0
	#include "bigDTD"

Anyway... the point is that you will be able to express (and validate)
the fact that a doc contains only level 0 features.