Re: HTML 2.0 specification "Daniel W. Connolly" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 94 15:02:58 EDT
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <email@example.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: HTML 2.0 specification
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
David: I forwarded your message to html-wg. Hope you don't mind.
Bill: I don't think David is on html-wg; hence he didn't get
In message <m0qgdlC-00001MC@monolith>, email@example.com writes:
>David C. Martin writes:
>> We have implemented several features from HTML+ that we would like to
>> discuss having in the HTML 2.0 specification. Specifically, we have
>> implemented the EMBED, GROUP and LINK elements.
>> Please let me know how we can participate in the discussion.
> The emacs browser has had the EMBED and LINK tags for quite a while. The
>LINK tag is in the HTML 2.0 spec. It would be nice if the EMBED tag would
>be included. The way I implemented it (ala an older HTML+ spec way back in
>'93) is as follows:
>data of somecontent/type
>should be done at all
> Something I added that wasn't in the HTML+ spec at the time was to add a
>SRC attribute similar to the <IMG> tag, so
><embed TYPE="somecontent/type" SRC="someurl">
>with no closing tag.