Re: ICADD elements in HTML

"Daniel W. Connolly" <>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 16:00:18 EDT
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <>
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: ICADD elements in HTML 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
In message <199409081944.MAA05255@rock>, Terry Allen writes:
>There seems to be consensus that adding the elements is the way
>to go;

I disagree. So much for consensus!

> so I say we might as well put them into 2.0 as wait for     

I STRONGLY disagree. Show me three major browsers that support ICADD
documents, and I'll support a change to HTML 2.0.

>  The documentation should make clear what their intended 
>use is, and warn ordinary HTML users that their rendering may
>differ considerably from one WWW browser to another.

This would be a great disservice to the community.