Re: The META element

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: SGML, HTML and CS: "
• Previous message: html-wg@oclc.org: ""
• Reply: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: The META element "

Date: Mon, 12 Sep 94 00:06:06 EDT
Message-id: <9409120403.AA05170@austin2.hal.com>
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: The META element 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

In message <9409091739.aa23054@paris.ics.uci.edu>, "Roy T. Fielding" writes:
>The reason META was placed in the "Proposed" section is because the
>definition was not present in the November '93 printing of the html-spec.
> After further discussions with Dan and TimBL,
>the current definition of META (the attribute names were changed from
>the HTML+ definition) was proposed with the intention of it being added
>to HTML 2.0 (Level 1) after people had a chance to examine the wording.
>I think that time has passed.

I agree, for what it's worth.

Dan