Re: The META element

"Daniel W. Connolly" <>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 94 00:06:06 EDT
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <>
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: The META element 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
In message <>, "Roy T. Fielding" writes:
>The reason META was placed in the "Proposed" section is because the
>definition was not present in the November '93 printing of the html-spec.
> After further discussions with Dan and TimBL,
>the current definition of META (the attribute names were changed from
>the HTML+ definition) was proposed with the intention of it being added
>to HTML 2.0 (Level 1) after people had a chance to examine the wording.
>I think that time has passed.

I agree, for what it's worth.