Re: <pre>

Peter Flynn <>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 17:53:46 EDT
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: Peter Flynn <>
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: <pre>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
> >This sounds correct, but does this imply that incautious Mac users who
> >make files containing plain ASCII text for PRE will have to insert LFs?
> The way I understand it, this is the way it works today (see the
> results of Corprew Reed's testing[1]). I see no reason to change it.

Nor I. I just didn't know if Mac users had to go thru this loop.
Presumably they do. I should have said "have", not "will have".