Re: Release of HTML 2.0 document for editing

Peter Flynn (
Tue, 23 Aug 94 12:26:56 EDT

Dan writes:
> p.s. I aplogize for taking so long to release the document. I had hoped
> to resolve the document production issues before releasing it, but that
> turned out to be a bad idea. Had I known I was going to punt those issues,
> I could have released it two weeks ago.

Don't fret, you've done a good job and this summary of the work
status is fine.

> I get a lot of "can we add X to HTML?" mail, and as I have warned
> folks that HTML 2.0 comments may be redistributed, I am just going to
> forward such questions to the working group, with the understanding
> that someone in the group will provide a much more patient and
> thorough explanation than I would.

I can undertake to make a response to these, keeping those that
look seriously promising for later (HTML x, 2<x<9). When you fwd them,
can you flag them in the subject with as asterisk or something (even
<add>...</add> :-)