Re: <pre>

Peter Flynn (
06 Oct 1994 16:45:08 +0100 (BST)

> In message <>, James Whitescarver writes:
> >It is not clear to me that <pre> should ignore CR. I think this is a bug
> >in the our browsers. The intent of <pre> was that such things are NOT
> >ignored. The specs may be wrong too. :)
> This issue came up on the HTML Working group list.
> The current practice[1] is that the LF character is what matters.
> The spec will say that CRLF is the correct way to break a line,
> but it will encourage browser implementors to accept LF alone
> as a linebreak, and caution authors and editor implementors
> that CR alone will _not_ work. (right, Mike?)

This sounds correct, but does this imply that incautious Mac users who
make files containing plain ASCII text for PRE will have to insert LFs?