Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in

Daniel W. Connolly (
Fri, 07 Oct 1994 16:06:19 -0500

In message <>, Eric W. Sink writes:
>Unless I hear otherwise, I assume that no one in the group had objections
>to Murray's 4-part contribution (regarding entities and character sets)
>be integrated into the spec.

I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but...

Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.

Other than that, everything Murray wrote is fine by me.