Re: <pre>

Peter Flynn (
07 Oct 1994 22:48:29 +0100 (BST)

> >This sounds correct, but does this imply that incautious Mac users who
> >make files containing plain ASCII text for PRE will have to insert LFs?
> The way I understand it, this is the way it works today (see the
> results of Corprew Reed's testing[1]). I see no reason to change it.

Nor I. I just didn't know if Mac users had to go thru this loop.
Presumably they do. I should have said "have", not "will have".