Re: Status: SDA -> HTML 2.0 for ICADD

Terry Allen (
Tue, 22 Nov 94 09:04:03 EST

You have DD = SDAForm Para. Yet a DD may itself contain paras.
Is this okay? By contrast, LI has SDAForm LItem.

For ISINDEX, instead of "Document is an index," please substitute
"Document is indexed and searchable" or something similar.

I don't see why Plaintext should be rendered as LIT for ICADD

Otherwise looks good; have you tested an implementation?


Terry Allen  (   O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
Editor, Digital Media Group    103A Morris St.
			       Sebastopol, Calif., 95472
A Davenport Group sponsor.  For information on the Davenport 
  Group see