Re: content model of HEAD

Terry Allen (
Mon, 19 Jun 95 22:51:37 EDT

While I agree with Joe's sentiment that like things should stay
together, and almost said something at the time, Lee has argued
plausibly that the change he requested relaxed an unintentionally
over-strict content model to match current practice. It's a
disgusting result, but that's what happens when usage is never
constrained. I have to support Lee (and Dan's judgement in making
the change at the last minute) here.

BTW, I think having element names that are plurals of others is evil:
sure can confuse the careless reader ...


Terry Allen  (   O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
Editor, Digital Media Group    101 Morris St.
			       Sebastopol, Calif., 95472

A Davenport Group sponsor. For information on the Davenport Group see or