Re: HTML firstname.lastname@example.org (Marc Andreessen)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 93 12:03:46 -0500
From: email@example.com (Marc Andreessen)
To: Dave_Raggett <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: HTML spec
> So why don't we lobby Adobe to put in URL based links into its next version
> of Postscript and go home now?
> Seriously - how much interest is there in a non-proprietary,
> lightweight extendable format derived from HTML? Am I barking up the
> wrong tree with HTML+ ?
Lots and nope. I think you're doing a great job with HTML,
particularly in that HTML+ will greatly enhance the capabilities of
WWW systems; it will get a lot of use and I look forward to supporting
it, as I've said before. But I would think that whether or not SGML
had anything to do with it or not, and I think it will be useful
to more people if SGML isn't allowed to philosophically restrict it
(similar to the way HTML became more useful with <I> and <B>).