HTML+ CommentsCharles Henrich <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Charles Henrich <email@example.com>
Subject: HTML+ Comments
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1993 22:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
(Forgive the non-elagance of these comments, its late :)
Howdy, just finished reading through the HTML+ RFC, and have a few comments
1) The specification allows </> to be a valid end tag for all tag's. I feel
this is a mistake as it leades to great ambiguity when the document is bein
parsed automatically, or being read by a human.
2) It appears that both the <img> and <fig> tag should be rolled into one, as
both accomplishes esentially the same thing.
3) Physical styles should remain seperate tag's as they are currently
implemented in HTML. (I.e <b> instead of <em b>). The <em> tag should refer
exclusivly to logical role's, and not physical styles.
(How come I have this dreaded feeling im about to be flamed? :)
Charles Henrich Michigan State University firstname.lastname@example.org