Re: HTML+ Comments

Nathan Torkington <>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1993 10:21:24 +1200
From: Nathan Torkington <>
Message-id: <>
In-reply-to: Rob Raisch's message <>
Subject: Re: HTML+ Comments
Status: RO
Rob Raisch writes:

> Is this the proper time to mention that <P> really
> needs to be a container (ie. <P>Content</P>) ?
> The abstraction of <P> being a seperator and not
> a container is the cause of much woe for those of
> us interested in defining styles.

Why is this?  The <P> as separator makes sense to me, and is valid