Re: HTML+ Comments

Nathan Torkington <Nathan.Torkington@vuw.ac.nz>

Mail folder: WWW Talk Jul-Oct 1993
Next message: Omy Ronquillo: "Printing graphics."
Previous message: Rob Raisch: "Re: HTML+ Comments"
In-reply-to: Rob Raisch: "Re: HTML+ Comments"
Reply: Rob Raisch: "Re: HTML+ Comments"

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1993 10:21:24 +1200
From: Nathan Torkington <Nathan.Torkington@vuw.ac.nz>
Message-id: <199307192221.AA19406@kauri.vuw.ac.nz>
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
In-reply-to: Rob Raisch's message <Pine.3.03.9307191757.C3235-9100000@amber.ora.com>
Subject: Re: HTML+ Comments
Status: RO

Rob Raisch writes:

> Is this the proper time to mention that <P> really
> needs to be a container (ie. <P>Content</P>) ?
> 
> The abstraction of <P> being a seperator and not
> a container is the cause of much woe for those of
> us interested in defining styles.

Why is this?  The <P> as separator makes sense to me, and is valid
SGML.

Nat