Re: Access Authorization

Bill Janssen <>
Message-id: <>
Date: 	Wed, 15 Sep 1993 12:22:56 PDT
Sender: Bill Janssen <>
From: Bill Janssen <>
To:, (Ari Luotonen)
Subject: Re: Access Authorization
In-reply-to: <>
References: <>
Status: RO
Excerpts from ext.WorldWideWeb: 15-Sep-93 Re: Access Authorization Ari
Luotonen@ptsun00.cer (2824)

> For instance in this
> example server is accepting both Kerberos authentication and "basic";
> if the server requires the relatively high authenticity that Kerberos
> provides, why is it that it should settle for less?

Presumably this is for the case where only "basic" is required, but the
server is willing to accept additional *higher-security* protocols as