Re: proposals for log file format changes

hgs@research.att.com (Henning G. Schulzrinne)

Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
Next message: Markus Stumpf: "SECURITY LEAK in ncsa httpd - PLEASE READ!!!!"
Previous message: michael shiplett: "Re: proposals for log file format changes "
In-reply-to: Rob McCool: "Re: proposals for log file format changes"
Reply: Kevin 'Kev' Hughes: "Re: proposals for log file format changes"

Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 14:25:24 --100
Message-id: <199402081322.OAA08782@eunet.EU.net>
Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: hgs@research.att.com (Henning G. Schulzrinne)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: proposals for log file format changes
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 330

May I suggest that the date format explicity conforms to whatever
date format is used with HTTP? (RFC 822, I believe). In particular,
time zones preferably should be specified as +/-0700 or some such.
There seems to be no good reason to have seventeen different time
formats within the same protocol realm.

Henning Schulzrinne