Re: HTML icon set was: Additions to the CGI archive

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: David Koblas: "HTML and end tags"
• Previous message: Martijn Koster: "Re: Useful icons or standard icons?"
• In-reply-to: Dale Dougherty: "Re: HTML icon set was: Additions to the CGI archive"
• Reply: Dave_Raggett: "Re: HTML icon set was: Additions to the CGI archive"

Message-id: <9401071054.AA15608@dxmint.cern.ch>
To: dale@ora.com (Dale Dougherty)
Cc: nikos@cbl.leeds.ac.uk, www-talk <www-talk@dxcern.cern.ch>, rick@ora.com
Subject: Re: HTML icon set was: Additions to the CGI archive
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jan 1994 16:44:38 PST." <9401061644.ZM3712@rock.west.ora.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 1994 09:33:26 +0000
From: Martijn Koster <m.koster@nexor.co.uk>

> [Dale offering to have the GNN designers design a set of icons]

That sounds promising :-)

> I recommend that we start with a small list of functions
> (next, previous, up)

plainfile, binaryfile, folder, search, help ?

> how do we get an agreement on such a library?

Well, that's why I want to resolve it with standard URL's. Your client
can then map the standard URL's to whatever icon library you want,
(So you don't need agreement :-) or use internal ones (so it's fast).
And of course, as Frans van Hoesel suggested, clients should make sure
they cache these things.

Pitty I'm not a client writer, then I could stop chatting and implement 
something :-).

-- Martijn
__________
Internet: m.koster@nexor.co.uk
X-400: C=GB; A= ; P=Nexor; O=Nexor; S=koster; I=M
X-500: c=GB@o=NEXOR Ltd@cn=Martijn Koster
WWW: http://web.nexor.co.uk/mak/mak.html