Re: WIT

Dave Raggett <dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
Next message: MATHEWS@vms.acer.edu.au: "NON delivery storms!"
Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: PROPOSAL: "W3A" - a client-side applets API "
Maybe in reply to: Fisher Mark: "Re: Re WIT"
Reply: John C. Mallery: "Re: WIT"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 16:19:23 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <9406241322.AA18963@dragget.hpl.hp.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Dave Raggett <dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: WIT
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas

Phill Hallam-Baker writes

>    What we need is a convention for typing that link as an "agree" or a 
>    "disagree" link. It would be easy enoug to modify the mail/news system to
>    give this capability. Instead of "reply to" or "post" we have a disagree 
>    and agree buttons producing the lines:-

>    Disagree <7396@cernvm.cern.ch> 
>    Agree <7396@cernvm.cern.ch>

I think we need other buttons to express a degree of interest, such as
        "Awful", "Poor", "Fair", "Good", "Great"

Seals Of APproval are a must have feature for discussion tools.
--
Best wishes,

Dave Raggett

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hewlett Packard Laboratories              email: dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Filton Road                               tel:   +44 272 228046
Stoke Gifford                             fax:   +44 272 228003
Bristol BS12 6QZ
United Kingdom