Re: The value of navigability (related to META...)email@example.com (Gavin Nicol)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:35:31 +0200
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Gavin Nicol)
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: The value of navigability (related to META...)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>The implication for HTML/HTTP is that features that improve document
>navigability are paramount. It's very tempting to follow the old
>publishing paradigm and focus first on rich formatting and such, that would
>be wrong and some other technology will surpass the Web quickly.
To a certain degree, I agree with you here.
>There will be great pressure from the publishing industry, where I come
>from, to focus primarily on the richness of the markup of individual
>documents. For the most part, those people should be ignored! They don't
Define markup, and I'll decide whether to agree or not.
One of the reasons why I have been asking for arbitrary SGML, and
arbitrary stylesheets is to aid navigation. An SGML document is (or
should be) basically a tree. One can use such structure for
sub-document navigtion, which might be important for very large
documents. The thing with stylesheets is perhaps not so much for
navigation, but with a generic stylesheet mechanism, parts of a
document can be formatted to best help people understand the
information. Such formatting might include removing large parts of
irrelevant data (for example, if you had a play, you might remove
everything *except* the names of the speakers, and when you clicked on
the speaker name, a box containing the speakers lines might appear).
This might seem like formatting, but it *is* related to navigation and
understanding via visual, and perhaps aural clues.
I agree that net navigation is important. I also believe sub-document
navigation is important. Let's try to support both.
No, I do not speak for EBT.