Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ]
pflynn@curia.ucc.ie (Peter Flynn)
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 18:21:14 EDT
Message-id: <9409062216.AA08155@curia.ucc.ie>
Reply-To: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie (Peter Flynn)
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
> OK folks... we need more input on this than just Terry and myself:
[...]
> Proposal 3: Combine html-0.dtd, html-1.dtd, html-2.dtd into one file,
> as per Terry's suggestion:
> >My solution to the three-DTD problem is to fold -1 and .
> >into -0, as marked sections, with the basic content models
> >supplied with empty parameter entities that expand within
> >those marked sections. Then there's only one file named
> >.dtd, and the IGNORE/INCLUDE operations are simple. Example
> >on request.
My vote goes to Proposal 3, mainly for the ease of handling one file
instead of three. For the doc type dec, is there a real chance that
the IETF will register with ISO?
///Peter