Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long]

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Eduardo Gutentag: "Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long]"
• Previous message: wmperry@spry.com: "Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long]"
• Maybe in reply to: wmperry@spry.com: "Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long]"
• Reply: Eduardo Gutentag: "Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long]"

Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 11:09:06 EDT
Message-id: <199409081509.LAA02504@ws02-00.rsch.oclc.org>
Reply-To: weibel@oclc.org
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: weibel@oclc.org
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

I agree that the ICADD additions are the right thing to do.  I will
support a  proposal to include them that does not endanger the goal
of submitting the 2.0 standard at the December IETF meeting.

stu