The RFC will be really long

eric@spyglass.com (Eric W. Sink)

Mail folder: html-archive
Next message: Murray Maloney: "Re: New (specific) suggestion for Monday time"
Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "<PLAINTEXT> clarification [Was: DTD Level 2 nit ]"

Date: Wed, 5 Oct 94 16:08:44 EDT
Message-id: <9410052006.AA15107@hook.spyglass.com>
Reply-To: eric@spyglass.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: eric@spyglass.com (Eric W. Sink)
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: The RFC will be really long
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)


I hear the group saying that the sections I proposed to omit are important
enough that they should stay.  So be it.  Thanks for the input!


--
Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer --  eric@spyglass.com 217-355-6000 ext 237
I don't speak for Spyglass.  They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
                                                               :-)  :-)
    "Never put your tongue on a glacier."